SD Gender Abortion Ban Bill Criticized, Revised

Updated: 03/04/2014 10:17 AM
Created: 03/04/2014 10:16 AM
By: NORA HERTEL, Associated Press

PIERRE, S.D. (AP) - South Dakota's proposed ban on gender-selective abortions would stigmatize Asian-Americans and promote racial stereotypes, opponents of the measure said during a hearing Monday.

Lena Tran, an Asian-American student at the University of South Dakota, said the ban would result in racial profiling against Asian women in doctors' offices.

"I personally would not get an abortion," Tran said to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee. "I do not want my friends and neighbors to look at me with suspicion."

The bill would make abortions based on the fetus' gender illegal, and physicians who do so could be charged with a felony. The committee deadlocked 3-3 on the measure Monday, which means the bill's sponsors can offer amendments when it is taken back up on Wednesday. The House passed the bill on Feb. 19.

Rep. Don Haggar, R-Sioux Falls, suggested during a House debate that the bill was necessary because of an influx of immigrants to the state. And Rep. Stace Nelson, R-Fulton, said that he spent 18 years in Asia in the military and believes parts of the world don't value women as much as he values his daughters.

No one at Monday's hearing endorsed sex-selective abortions, and there are no available statistics to demonstrate that sex-selective abortions have taken place in the state.

"We really have no indication as to whether this is really a problem. Or is this a solution looking for a problem?" asked Sen. Bruce Rampelberg, R-Rapid City. A Fiscal Impact Statement on the bill says, "violations are likely to be rare, and successful prosecutions very rare."

South Dakota is among a number of states proposing legislation to ban gender-selective abortions. A similar bill that explicitly references race is currently being challenged in Arizona courts. The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion rights nonprofit whose statistics are widely respected, reports that seven other states already have laws banning abortion based on the gender of a fetus. Such laws remain in effect in six states.

Those pushing to ban sex-selective abortions, though, say safeguards are necessary because the sex of the fetus can be determined earlier than ever, allowing more time to seek the procedure before the 12th week of pregnancy after which it's more difficult to have an abortion in South Dakota.

"This bill has nothing to do with race," said Rep. Jenna Haggar, the bill's main sponsor. "These abortions are wrong. They're wrong in any and every culture."

The Sioux Falls Republican said advancements in gender testing allow parents to learn the sex of a fetus earlier than ever, adding, "we would be naive to think that this type of abortion could not happen here and right now."

She said that no country in the world has more women than men and in some nations it is more culturally valuable to have sons.

Opponents, though, say the bill chips away at abortion rights and promotes racial profiling of Asian-American women.

"We object profusely to the way our community is being used to promote this bill," said Shivana Jorawar, a representative of the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum who testified by phone. "It co-opts the language of equality while undermining the equality of Asian-Americans."

Republican Sen. Blake Curd, who is a medical doctor in Sioux Falls, raised a number of concerns about the bill, asking why it would place the blame on doctors rather than the women seeking abortions.

"It's ironically misogynistic to me to say that a woman can't make the decision based on the information that she has at hand," Curd said.

Haggar said she believes women are often coerced into having abortions, and supporters of the measure say it complements existing anti-coercion legislation. Currently in South Dakota, women must to wait 72 hours and demonstrate they aren't being coerced into having the procedure.

(Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Front Page

  • Pilot Safely Rescued after Ditching Cirrus Plane in Sea

    The pilot of a small plane ditched into the sea after running out of fuel 250 miles off Hawaii, but he was safely rescued after officials guided the stricken craft to the area of a cruise ship.

  • 'Option C' Architects Recommend Complete Rebuild of Duluth Public Library

    MSR's report recommends building a completely new facility of roughly the same size at the existing library site. The report estimates the project, known as 'Option C,' will cost $34.7 million. The report says that the overwhelming majority of public responses favored that option. 63 percent voiced support for Option C, while none of the other three options received more than 16 percent.

  • City Council Approves $300K Loan to Norshor Theatre Developer

    The Duluth City Council approved a $300,000 loan agreement Monday night for design work on the Norshor Theatre project in downtown however, that loan comes before any development agreement has been signed. 

  • Man Accused of Intentionally Running Over Woman in Superior Alley

    A Superior man faces a possible charge of attempted second-degree intentional homicide after allegedly running over a woman with a car in an alley early Saturday morning and fleeing the scene.

  • Nolan: 3 Iron Range Mines Reach Haze Deal with EPA

    Two Northland mining companies have reached an agreement on haze with federal regulators, according to U.S. Rep. Rick Nolan. The agreement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cliffs Natural Resources, and ArcelorMittal will give the companies more time to develop, pilot, engineer, and install new equipment.